Online Store

Original air date:  September 14, 2016.  Intent in Patent Infringement:  How the Supreme Court's opinions in Octane Fitness, Halo and Kirtsaeng have changed the game.

 

Over the past two years the Supreme Court has issued three opinions covering aspects of intent in cases involving infringement of intellectual property.  Join the advocates who argued those cases on the appellate level, Rudy Telscher of Harness Dickey who argued Octane Fitness before the Court, Jeff Wall of Sullivan and Cromwell who argued Halo Electronics before the Court, and Andrew Silverman of Orrick who argued Kirtsaeng before the Second Circuit for a discussion of the Court’s opinions and how district courts have started to interpret them.